Daily Archives: September 19, 2016

How the UN Failed West Papua

The Diplomat.com – By Prianka Srinivasan, September 19, 2016

NEW YORK — A decade ago, Herman Wainggai caused a diplomatic furor between Indonesia and Australia when he boarded a homemade canoe and crossed the Arafura Sea to the northern tip of Australia. Escaping his home in the Indonesian-controlled territory of West Papua, Wainggai feared that his campaign for West Papuan independence would soon cost him his life. In March 2006, Australia recognized Wainggai as a refugee and granted him protection. Indonesia responded by temporarily recalling its Australian ambassador.

With reports of renewed intimidation by Indonesian authorities in West Papua, Wainggai will once again embark on a controversial journey to seek justice for his people. This time, his destination is New York’s UN headquarters to lobby at its 71st General Assembly. “We want to remind the UN they can’t let West Papua be colonized for so long,” said Wainggai in a telephone interview.

But Wainggai’s task will not be easy. The UN has slumbered in its decolonization efforts, with only one state, Timor-Leste, achieving independence in the past 20 years. Added to that, West Papua is currently unrecognized by the world body as a colonized “non-self-governing territory”—it lost this designation over four decades ago, when West Papua was integrated by Indonesia through controversial means.

Enjoying this article? Click here to subscribe for full access. Just $5 a month.This leaves West Papuan independence activists in a uniquely undesirable position: fighting to be recognized by a world body that has lost much of its ability and will to bring about decolonization.

Decolonization once defined the United Nation’s very existence. When the UN was first conceived in 1945, a third of the world’s population still lived under colonial rule and many of those territories were agitating for autonomy. Under the heat of global anti-imperial movements, colonial territories disintegrated to form independent states, and the UN’s membership doubled in size in just 20 years. In 1960, the UN General Assembly adopted United Nations Resolution 1514, which declared the “necessity of bringing to a speedy and unconditional end colonialism in all its forms and manifestations.” A year later, the Special Committee of Decolonization formed to carry out the UN’s mandate and help colonized nations achieve autonomy.

But this help came at a price. The UN’s decolonization mandate was often brought in and out of play by its two largest powerbrokers—the United States and the Soviet Union—so they could extend their influence in the post-colonial world. As a result, the UN’s decolonization efforts did not always make the autonomy of colonized peoples its first priority.

West Papuans became one of the first causalities of the UN’s perfidious promise of self-determination. In 1968, under the watch of UN observers and U.S. diplomats, Indonesia was handed control over West Papua when its military hand-picked a fraction of West Papua’s population, and ordered them to vote in favor of Indonesian annexation in the UN-supervised “Act of Free Choice.” A 2004 report by the International Human Rights Clinic at Yale Law School explains that “Indonesian military leaders began making public threats against Papuan leaders… vowing to shoot them on the spot if they did not vote for Indonesian control.” The United States, acting both independently and through the UN, tacitly allowed West Papua’s annexation to ensure Indonesia would not fall to communism.

In such a way, the UN’s decolonization efforts were always conditional on the whims of international politicians. As U.S. and Soviet tensions receded, so too did the UN’s ambition to guide colonized territories to independence. The U.K., U.S. and France all moved to abolish the Special Committee on Decolonization in the early 1990s, and the U.K. and U.S. formally withdrew from the committee in 1986 and 1992 respectively. Persistent campaigning from the world’s small territories was all that revived the Special Committee from its deathbed, though doing so compromised much of its function and scope.

“That really left a gap, a vacuum which still exists today,” said Dr. Carlyle Corbin, a former minister of the U.S.-controlled Virgin Islands who serves as an international expert to the UN on self-determination. Though there continues to be a need for the UN to follow its decolonization mandate, particularly in relation to its 17 recognized colonial territories, Corbin says that member states blatantly ignore this duty. Representatives from France, one of the few administrative powers that still interacts with the UN’s decolonization committee, make a point of walking out of discussions whenever the topic is French Polynesia.

UN members accept this lack of commitment since colonization is no longer seen as a modern phenomenon. “Decolonization is not on the radar,” Corbin said. “The idea is that it’s over.” Administrative powers that preside over colonial territories are able to hide behind this misconception, claiming that their dependent territories could not possibly be associated with this evil, outdated practice.

The United States, which currently administers three territories listed by the UN’s decolonization committee, argues that its territories have implied self-governance and therefore should be removed from decolonization talks. Indeed, many of the 17 recognized colonial territories have some quasi form of self-governance—Guam, American Samoa, and the U.S. Virgin Islands all have non-voting representation in the U.S. Congress, and Britain’s overseas territories maintain localized governments, with ultimate constitutional authority remaining with Britain. In some cases, such as in the Falkland Islands and Gibraltar, local populations do not want to concede their dependency relationships.

But for Corbin, this is beside the point. “Colonization by consent is not self-governance,” he said, and if the UN is to follow its own resolution on the rights of indigenous people, then it should work to eradicate any remnant of colonialism, however benign.

For West Papua, where instances of state oppression by Indonesian authorities harken back to more overt forms of colonialism, the UN has still failed to support its independence. The world body does not even recognize West Papua as a colonized territory, thus effectively depriving West Papuans of UN resources to fuel their struggle for self-determination.

The result of this omission is calamitous. There is strong evidence of gross human rights violations in Indonesian-held West Papua, yet the UN is has not yet intervened in this territory. The counterterrorism squad, Detachment 88, which was developed in 2003 by funding through the United States government, is accused of being especially violent toward indigenous West Papuans.

“They can operate independently and together, intimidating, harassing, beating up, and indeed killing people,” said Peter Arndt, executive officer of the Catholic Justice and Peace Commission of the Archdiocese of Brisbane. He made the remarks last March following a visit to West Papua. A report compiled by Arndt accuses the Indonesian government of making new, violent incursions into the region, systematically expelling Papuans from their homes in what the report calls a “slow-motion genocide.” Some 30 years ago, 96 percent of West Papua was inhabited by its indigenous population. Today, that number is closer to 40 percent.

In such a state of emergency, the solution for West Papua might be to abandon the UN’s decolonization process all together. Wainggai and other West Papuan activists have chosen to bring their plight instead to human rights organizations, like the UN’s Human Rights Council, to urge change on humanitarian grounds.

There are also regional movements to recognize West Papuan independence—the Solomon Islands and Tonga both articulated support for West Papuans at last year’s UN General Assembly, with the Solomon Islands’ Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare calling for “the full and swift implementation of the 1960 declaration on the granting of Independence to colonized countries and peoples.”

Nevertheless, Wainggai remains hopeful that one day, as the UN’s member states convene for another General Assembly in New York, a free and autonomous West Papua will be included in discussions. “That’s my American dream,” he said.

Prianka Srinivasan is an Australian freelance journalist based in New York. She has spent a number of years working and researching in the Pacific region.

How the UN Failed West Papua was originally published on PAPUAPost.com

Negara-negara Pasifik Pendukung Referendum Papua Bertambah

Penulis: Reporter Satuharapan 19:41 WIB | Senin, 05 September 2016


Anggota dan simpatisan Pacific Coalition on West Papua (PCWP) berfoto bersama Sekretaris Jenderal Pacific Islands Forum, Dame Meg Taylor di East West Center, di Honolulu. (Foto: Sekretariat Pers PM Solomon Islands)

HONOLULU, SATUHARAPAN.COM – Para diplomat Indonesia tampaknya belum dapat tidur nyenyak. Gerakan yang menyuarakan penentuan nasib sendiri Papua belakangan ini menggeliat lagi.

Setelah sempat melemah pasca tertahannya permohonan United Liberation Movement for West Papua (UMWP) untuk bergabung dengan Melanesian Spearhead Group (MSG), gerakan ini mencoba bangkit. Kali ini melalui apa yang disebut sebagai Pacific Coalition for West Papua (PCWP) atau Koalisi Pasifik untuk Papua Barat.

Menurut siaran pers dari sekretariat pers PM Kepulauan Solomon, PCWP yang diprakarsai oleh PM negara tersebut, Manasye Sogavare, yang juga ketua MSG (Melanesian Spearhead Group), terbentuk beberapa bulan lalu di Honiara, ibukota Kepulauan Solomon. PCWP terbentuk pasca terhentinya ULMWP bergabung ke MSG.

Menurut penjelasan resmi Sogavare, PCWP bertujuan untuk menggalang dukungan negara-negara Pasifik untuk menyerukan Perserikatan Bangsa-bangsa (PBB) melakukan intervensi atas pelanggaran HAM dan penentuan nasib sendiri bagi Papua. Anggota awal PCWP terdiri dari Pemerintah Kepulauan Solomon, Pemerintah Vanuatu, kelompok Front de Liberation Nationale Kanak et Socialiste(FLNKS), ULMWP dan kelompok Lembaga Swadaya Masyarakat (LSM) Pasifik, Pacific Islands Association Non Govermental Organization (PIANGO).

Dalam pertemuan mereka di Aloha, Honolulu, pada hari Jumat lalu (2/9), dukungan terhadap koalisi ini bertambah dengan bergabungnya dua negara Pasifik lain, yaitu Pemerintah Tuvalu dan Republik Nauru. Kedua negara ini masing-masing diwakili oleh Perdana Menteri Tuvalu, Enele Sopoaga dan Duta Besar Nauru untuk PBB, Marlene Moses.

Tidak hanya dua negara ini yang memberikan dukungan. Dua pihak lain juga sudah menunjukkan dukungan, ketika inisiatif ini diperkenalkan di Honiara. Keduanya adalah Kerajaan Tonga dan Republik Kepulauan Marshall. Dukungan kedua negara ini juga telah terkonfirmasi pada Jumat lalu (2/9) dengan kehadiran Perdana Menteri Tonga, Akilisi Pohiva dan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum Republik Kepulauan Marshall, David Paul.

Pada pertemuan di Aloha itu, semua anggota PCWP hadir, kecuali Republik Vanuatu yang tidak mengirimkan wakil. Sekretaris Jenderal Pacific Islands Forum (PIF) –sebuah forum negara-negara Pasifik lain yang keanggotaannya lebih luas dan akan bertemu pekan ini — Dame Meg Taylor, turut pula hadir pada pertemuan tersebut.

Pada pertemuan itu, Sogavere berpidato dan mengatakan negara-negara Pasifik memiliki tugas mengatasi masalah-masalah yang dihadapi Papua, sebagai kerabat terdekat. Dia kembali menekankan bahwa referendum atau ‘menentukan nasib sendiri’ adalah hak Papua, yang sejak 50 tahun terakhir telah dituntut. Hak itu, kata dia, juga merupakan prinsip dasar Piagam PBB.

Ia menekankan bahwa tujuan dari PCWP benar-benar sejalan dengan prinsip-prinsip HAM dan demokrasi, dan semua negara PBB harus mematuhi dan melindunginya.

Di bagian lain, Sogavare mengakui apa yang diinisiasi oleh PCWP bukan tugas yang mudah. Bangsa-bangsa di Pasifik, kata dia, memerlukan pendekatan kolaboratif dan strategis untuk mengantisipasi masalah yang akan datang. “Hanya dengan bekerja secara strategis dan bersama-sama, kita bisa menangani masalah di Papua Barat,” tuturnya.

Menunggu Respon Presiden Joko Widodo

Sekjen PIF, Dame Taylor, ketika mendapat kesempatan berbicara pada pertemuan itu. mengatakan bahwa pada pertemuan puncak PIF ke-46 di Port Moresby pada tahun 2015, telah diputuskan untuk mengirim tim pencari fakta ke Papua. Namun, kata dia, Pemerintah Indonesia menganggap istilah ‘pencari fakta’ terkesan ofensif.

Dame Taylor mengatakan sampai saat ini pihaknya masih menunggu respon dari Presiden Joko Widodo atas rekomendasi PIF. Ia mengatakan sudah bertemu dengan Ketua PIF yaitu PM Papua Nugini, Peter O’Neil dan juga dengan Presiden Indonesia, Joko Widodo. Proses sedang berjalan untuk memenuhi resolusi PIF, kata dia, dan ia mengharapkan Ketua PIF dan presiden Joko Widodo akan bertemu.

Sementara itu, Sekjen ULMWP, Octovianus Mote mengklaim bahwa ULMWP mewakili gerakan kemerdekaan Papua dan akan terus mengejar hak-hak rakyatnya untuk menentukan nasib sendiri dan semua hak-hak lainya yang tercantum dalam Piagam PBB.

Perdana Menteri Sapoaga dari Tucalu mengatakan negaranya menghargai dan bersimpati sepenuhnya dengan aspirasi dan keinginan rakyat Papua untuk mempunyai hak otonomi sendiri.

Sementara Menteri Republik Kepulauan Marshall mengatakan negaranya melihat masalah Papua dari perspektif kemanusiaan dan masalah kemanusiaan berada di garis depan mereka.

Perwakilan dari FLNKS, Rodrigue Tiavouane, mengatakan bahwa FLNKS mendukung penuh inisiatif PCWP dan strategi yang akan dilaksanakan.

Ia menambahkan bahwa FLNKS juga melalui proses yang sama dalam ‘penentuan hak otonom sendiri’ dimulai dari bergabung dengan MSG lalu ke PIF dan akhinya ke Komite 24 PBB (Komite Khusus Dekolonisasi).

Perdana Menteri Pohiva dari Tonga mengatakan adalah kewajiban moral untuk mengatasi pelanggaran HAM di Papua dengan adanya seruan ‘penentuan nasib sendiri’.

Dia mengatakan pada Sidang Umum PBB ke-70 tahun lalu, ia berbicara tentang tujuan dan pertanggung jawaban pemerintah atas semua hal yang tidak mungkin terwujud tanpa dukungan penuh kepada HAM di daerah konflik di seluruh dunia termasuk di Kepulauan Pasifik.

Sementara itu Duta dari Tuvalu mengatakan adalah penting bahwa masalah Papua akan dibawa ke Komite 24 PBB. Namun ia juga mengatakan apa yang berhasil untuk beberapa orang tidak selalu berhasil pada orang lain.

Anggota PIANGO dari Tonga, Drew Havea mengatakan PIANGO mengakui penderitaan yang dialami rakyat Papua adalah juga penderitaan Pasifik dan mendesak para pemimpin Pasifik untuk bersepakat menghentikan kekerasan di Papua dan selanjutnya menemukan jalur damai ‘menentukan nasib sendiri’. (kav)

Editor : Eben E. Siadari

Negara-negara Pasifik Pendukung Referendum Papua Bertambah was originally published on PAPUAPost.com